Thursday, September 30, 2010

Toothache or neuralgia?





A sixty year old lady complaining of pain on her upper right second molar, was referred to me for RCT/retreatment . After dismantling the crown, the missed disto-buccal canal was negotiated. Cleaning and shaping were carried out and dressed with CaOH for two weeks. During her second visit, a small perforation near the MB canal orifice was discovered and repaired with mineral trioxide, and canals obturated.


However, the patient still complained of the tingling sensation. I was suspecting other teeth on quadrant one and four. Three months later, the upper second molar showed normal probings, normal responses to palpation and percussion. Peri-apical radiograph showed periapical lesion at palatal root has disappeared. A month later, her facial pain became more intense. She described the pain to be like "fire-burning" that lasted less than two minutes when she washed her face in the morning and when she drank soup. I also realised that she was partially edentulous on quadrant one and four, whereas all her teeth were still intact at quadrant two and three. I diagnosed trigeminal neuralgia.


She went to a maxillofacial surgeon for a second opinion and started her on Tegretol. Her pain is gone since then!

Wednesday, September 29, 2010

Nice healing of a large peri-apical lesion



A colleague referred a patient for root canal treatment (RCT) on her lower central incisor to me because of the large apical lesion. A tooth with large apical lesion indicates long standing infection of its pulp. Does RCT really work on a tooth that has been infected for many years? If RCT is not successful, then an apical surgery is indicated.

RCT was carried out in the standard manner. The tooth was isolated with a rubber dam and secured with Wedjet because the lower incisor was too tiny to place a clamp over it.
Obturation was carried out after placing calcium hydroxide in the canal for the two weeks. Note the two portal of exits at the apex. A composite restoration was placed.

One year review showed almost resolution of the peri-apical lesion. Hence, apical surgery is not required.